Calculating the real number of infections from Covid-19 on some European Countries on June 1st.

Obtaining the Infection Fatality Rate On the past two weeks two most important studies were made public. One from the Public Health Agency of Sweden1 reporting the calculated real infection fatality rate of Covid-19 in Stockholm, and another from the MIT2 . Both having the same goal: estimating the real infection fatality rate (IFR). This corresponds to the odds of dying from the disease, including those who have mild or no symptoms. How does this differ from the values reported by official figures? Official figures only include the number of people having been tested positive. And people without symptoms, nor with a known contact with another person having tested positive, don’t often get tested, unless it gets into a random population study. With this in mind, the ratio you get with the current figures is known as Case Fatality Rate (CFR), which corresponds to the number of fatalities based on the number of known infections. Knowing the number of how many people went undetected is what allows you to calculate the most import indicator of a pandemic disease: the actual fatality rate. Countries with the lowest CFR puts it at around 3.9%, such as Czechia, where others, such as Italy or Belgium exceeds 10%. …

The quest for the real Infection Fatality Rate – Germany just crossed 1% IFR

Note: At the time this post was published, IFR in Germany stands at 1.08%. There is one and only one argument people electing to overlook the COVID-19 pandemic take: the infection fatality rate is being vastly overstated. In order to understand how overstated it is, it’s fundamental to know the ratio of asymptomatic infections. The fundamental lead indicator of how bad the Covid-19 pandemic can be is the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR). This indicator allows governments to calculate the final number of deaths, based on the number of infections. However, the IFR is defined as the total number of infections, including those which are asymptomatic or those who were never formally diagnosed with he disease. So, on one hand, this indicador may be very pessimistic, because we all know ultimately not all those infected will ever get diagnosed, but on the other hand, while the pandemic is still progressing, it also assumes that all current infected will not die was well. Then there’s the problem of how reliable are the Chinese figures. Literally ever doubts the Chinese figures, the problem is, which figures do you doubt the most? The number of infections, or the number of deceased. And here lies the problem. If China withhold the …

Back to Top