What if the figures are much worst than are being touted? Just look at the official figures.

It seems weird that the entire world is relying on a single private website to know where it stands. Even weirder that on some countries there isn’t even one official portal announcing to the world how many people were affected by the Covid-19 pandemic, never mind publishing accurate and on time data on indicators such as number people in ICU (other than the PM), people having recovered from the disease or even fatalities. The UK every single day looks eagerly at the daily figures published on Gov.uk by Public Health England (PHE) and the Department of Health and Social Care. Then, let’s just ignore for a minute how few indicators are being published ( cumulative infections by community, number of tests, number of tests subjects and fatalities). Let’s then focusing on the single most important figure of the pandemic (not because people are nothing more than figures, but it is the only way you size how big the disaster is, and why people should be locked at home): fatalities. The thing with fatalities is the method used to collect that information: you ask hospitals how many people were reported in the last 24hours to have died in hospitals in those …

The quest for the real Infection Fatality Rate – Germany just crossed 1% IFR

Note: At the time this post was published, IFR in Germany stands at 1.08%. There is one and only one argument people electing to overlook the COVID-19 pandemic take: the infection fatality rate is being vastly overstated. In order to understand how overstated it is, it’s fundamental to know the ratio of asymptomatic infections. The fundamental lead indicator of how bad the Covid-19 pandemic can be is the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR). This indicator allows governments to calculate the final number of deaths, based on the number of infections. However, the IFR is defined as the total number of infections, including those which are asymptomatic or those who were never formally diagnosed with he disease. So, on one hand, this indicador may be very pessimistic, because we all know ultimately not all those infected will ever get diagnosed, but on the other hand, while the pandemic is still progressing, it also assumes that all current infected will not die was well. Then there’s the problem of how reliable are the Chinese figures. Literally ever doubts the Chinese figures, the problem is, which figures do you doubt the most? The number of infections, or the number of deceased. And here lies the problem. If China withhold the …

Partial lockdown in effect that that will be too late for 9000 people

What an interesting week. First, on the 23rd, Boris Johnson fully reversed its original plan to obtain herd immunity and announced a home lockdown, affecting every single activity other than those deemed essential. However, the list of “essencial services” is long and wide. From telecommunications to groceries, a significant part of the economy and the associated workforce will still be out of home every single day. Second, and this is where things get interesting, it’s already known how long it takes for the people getting from sick to dead: 16 days. This means that, when Boris announced the lock down, 335 people had already perished, but because of this delay, 9252 will also not survive until this lock down takes effect. This effect was already confirmed in Spain and Italy, and it does’t even has a relation with the real IFR or CFR. It’s just caused but the fact the current trend can only be altered by measures, and none was taken before. What actually happens right after those 16 days have passed? No one knows. Italy will make its 16th day on the 31st. Then we’ll know. Third, Public Health England recognised it could not keep track of all …

UK is flying blind, and the the possible forecast for March 26th

Without knowing where you are, you can’t even start to know where you’re heading to. The last few days’ figures show a very sorry picture of the UK. Yes, the infection grow rate if one of the lowest on Europe, but if you compare that with the number of fatalities, it paints a very clear picture. Infection fatality rate (IFR) now stands at around 5.22%. Why the “around at”, because it’s 11PM and there are no updated figures on the fatalities over the last 24 hours. This can’t be true. It’s not like you need to find people with symptoms to be able to test, or they may simply being staying at home with symptoms. You just’t cannot hide the fact someone died from a disease it was already known to have. On the infection figures, it’s just laughable: infection rate of 10.26% just after a day mandatory stay at home order was issues, an order compliance level is lacking to say the least, doesn’t deserve any kind of credit. Having a 5.22% IFR means that you’re at least underestimating the number of infections by a factor of 4. So, not only you don’t how where you’re heading, you don’t know …

Hold my Budweiser, Disaster brewing in the US, the caos in the UK and March 23rd forecast

What happens when you start massively testing your population after spending the last 2 months with your head stuck in the sand? You get 8000 newly infected people. And the day is only ending in a few hours on the US. While the UK government still doesn’t have a clue how many infected people are roaming the streets, in the US, and specially in New York and Washington state, people are now being massively tested. Not that those people were just infected that week. Instead, infection was reading all over the place, but due to the lack of testing materials went unnoticed. The result? The US is already the 4th country with the highest number of daily fatalities, and will undoubtedly reach Italy infection number within this week. On the UK, today’s figures are still all over the place. Daily reported newly infected cases dropped to around half of yesterday’s. Now, everyone knows viruses don’t stop during weekends, but people seem to, which renders today’s figures an exercise of futility, specially if you look at the fatalities figures, which albeit better than yesterday, is still the second highest. Looking at the trends, the image is much murkier.  Uk’s fatality rate is …

Worst day for the UK, looming disaster, 17-day forecast and March 22nd forecast

Today was a terrible day all around, Italy, Spain, Us, and finally the UK. Another 56 people lost their lives. The fact that another thousand people were also reported infected just underlines the looking disaster. Modelling epidemics is an extremely complex and far from accurate science. However, that’s only needed if you want a very accurate result. If you only need broad figures under very exact conditions, that’s easy enough you can use a spreadsheet to calculate it. A new study from the Imperial College underwrites some initial findings from the chinese doctors attending to the initial epidemic. The main findings are: Average time between symptoms onset and a positive detection – 2 days Average time between a positive result and a fatal result – 14 days Then, we can also consider the current figures for the countries initially affected by COVID-19: China and South Korea, which represent opposite ends of the spectrum: On South Korea one can observe what happens when the disease is caught on time, and entire populations are tested against it. In this case, the fatality rate is around 1%. Consider this the minimum obtainable fatality rate on a developed country with the current treatment protocols. …

The new normal and the March 21st forecast

It may take a few days, but rest assured, the math will always reestablishes its will. So, yes, we lost the capability to understand the overall status, but we can still estimate the evolution of both infections and deaths. In fact, yesterday’s forecasts were dead on, within a 5% margin. I’m always happy when I’m proven wrong, and I’m now a very sad guy. Tomorrow expect around 4560 cumulative infections and 216 cumulative deaths. As usual the source spreadsheet is available here.

UK and US vs Germany and forecast for March 20th

Yesterday’s figures were not one off. The number of casualties is ever increasing and it’s now obvious and clear the figures for infected people is but a fraction of the reality. UK’s deceased due to Covid-19 is now 4 times those of Germany, but Germany has 5 times as many infected. The difference is, Germany actually know how many infected are within their borders, the UK doesn’t have a clue, other than the insane number of fatalities. Then, there’s a telltale indicator something is terribly wrong. UK’s fatality rate (new cases vs fatalities) now stands at 4.48%, which roughly means that for each fatality 20 others become infected. However, on Germany, which is testing people, all people, people showing symptoms or people not showing them, has 0.22% or roughly one per 450 infected. Assuming healthcare into the UK is at least as good as in Germany, it means that there are 46800 infected people in the UK, not the infamous 2600 value. This is what sets competent governments from blatantly incompetent ones. Competent governments know how many people  are infected so preparations can be made in advance. Incompetent governments refuse to realize there’s a problem, then that there’s anything to …

On the last 24 hours and forecast for March 19th

Something continues to be off. PHE hasn’t  yet found a fixed time to publish new data. Today data referring to the last 24 hours ending at 9AM was only published at 18:44. To make things worst, it was the worst day possible with 43 new casualties. The UK is now fast approaching Italy’s new fatalities to new infection ratio, at around 3.95%. This value compares to Italy’s 8.5%, Spain’s 4.3% and South Korea (the other country massively testing entire population) of 0.9%. For tomorrow, and the next few days, things will not improve. Actually, until April 4th, expect ever increasing number of daily fatalities. Specially for tomorrow, around 3.5 thousand cumulative infections , and between 138 and 176 cumulative fatalities.   As usual the source spreadsheet is available here.

Current situation, forecast for March 18th and past analysis

Well, from now on, NHS updates all results at 9AM concerning the events of the previous day. As such, the values obtained from today are significantly skewed, both in terms of new infections and fatalities, although that will eventually be diluted over time. Even then, and although the number of new fatalities (5) was significantly reduced as compared with the previous day, that reduction was due to the new calculation time, rather than any solid good news. The other change is regarding the testing methods. UK and most northern european countries are now not testing all cases, but only those which are severe enough to need hospital attention. This makes the “new cases” indicator a totally useless figure. This fact has dire consequences. To start, it doesn’t allow the government even to estimate the extent of the epidemics, so it can’t even know to close it is to a potencial herd immunity threshold. Then, the only hard data is is either the number of severely sick, of the number of dead, and those come at a price, other than the human life: delay. It’s not possible to easily measure on the patient was originally infected after being brought in to the …

Back to Top